The text looks much similar to Icelandic in the absence of the smartfont. And the fonts show the complex forms of the native scripts via the ligature feature in OpenFont.
The underlying code is from SBCS (Latin-1) native grammar compliant romanized Indic. These fonts are an alternative to double-byte Indic, very difficult to learn and type. (Notice the ‘text-rendering’ and ‘font-feature-settings’ ) format(“woff”)} We are testing orthographic smart-fonts served out of. This is about a method that potentially impacts a billion people. Having said that, the webfont test I just ran used the single-word Tangerine font, and the issue still occurred, so I’m not sure there is a solution to the 2007/TNR problem ? We discovered that removing the quote marks around the font names solved this. ‘Helvetica Neue’, and Outlook that can cause this stubborn TNR appearance. Getting them to accept that they’re going to see differences across a significant majority of platforms is going to be near impossible.įrans: There’s an issue with fonts that have multiple-word names with spaces, e.g.
: Outlook 2002, XP, 2003, 2007, 2010, 2013Ĭonvincing one’s clients – particularly those with a rightfully protective sense of their company’s/brand’s identity – that an email design will look different on a few email platforms due to non-webfont idiosyncracies is already difficult enough. *Should* we add Google Fonts? Unless you’re sure that your target audience is comprised overwhelmingly of Apple device toters, it’s still a big fat sad “Nope”.Ī quick test reveals that more platforms DON’T support Google Fonts than do.